June 11, 2004
Order of Service for State Funeral of Ronald Wilson Reagan
The National Cathedral has
published the bulletin for today's funeral service.
Former US Senator John Danforth, an ordained Episcopal minister, will be officiating the service, which starts at 11:30 AM ET.
For those of you who will not be able to view the service on television, C-Span, MSNBC, CBS News, ABC News, and most likely most local television station websites will all stream the service live; many radio stations and radio station websites will do likewise.
C-SPAN 1: (RealPlayer | WMP 9/10)
CBS News
MSNBC/NBC News
CityPulse 24 Toronto
WRC-TV/DT Washington
Posted by: mhking at
05:11 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 111 words, total size 1 kb.
June 10, 2004
Jimmy Kimmel in hot water for Detroit remarks
Jimmy Kimmel's late night ABC show is not shown here in Atlanta. I get to watch it once in a while on WABC New York via satellite (I love my DirecTV system!). Atlanta residents couldn't have watched the show last night even if local affiliate WSB-TV weren't such sticks in the mud.
Kimmel got himself in hot water during halftime of the Pistons-Lakers NBA Finals game Tuesday night.
During an interview with ABC studio host (and Ann Arbor resident) Mike Tirico, Kimmel made an off the cuff remark about Detroit and riots.
Kimmel, when asked by ABC Sports commentator Mike Tirico who he was rooting for, replied, "Besides the fact I'm a Lakers fan, I realize they're going to burn the city of Detroit down if the Pistons win."
Tirico came to the city's defense, but Kimmel plowed on with the grace of a bull in a china shop, later jokingly offering an apology.
"What I said about Pistons fans during halftime was a joke, nothing more. If I offended anyone, I'm sorry," he said. "Clearly, over the past 10 years, we in L.A. have taken a commanding lead in post-game riots. If the Lakers win, I plan to overturn my own car."
Detroit residents haven't been placated by Kimmel's remarks, and ABC "punished" the comedian by yanking Wednesday's pre-taped edition of the late night show.
The show is back on tonight, albeit later than it's usual 12:05AM slot, following tonight's NBA Finals game.
Will there be more contrition from Kimmel? Tune in and find out...
Posted by: mhking at
04:28 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 269 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Given L.A.'s experience in this area, can they talk? Not a big deal to me.
Posted by: molotov at June 10, 2004 04:39 PM (h3FX8)
2
Since Kimmel still isn't being carried on the local Atlanta ABC affiliate, I figured I'd drop an update -- he was wearing a Pistons jersey and Tigers hat during the night. He also had Detroit native Chris Webber as a guest, although he tried to skirt the whole Detroit issue.
Posted by: JQ at June 10, 2004 08:42 PM (+QIvh)
3
I have an LAPD friend who says that he hates when the Lakers win a championship. Long hours and too much fool-chasing. :-)
Posted by: Juliette at June 11, 2004 06:53 PM (O7Upp)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Jesse Jackson continues to vilify Reagan, though stats show true story

Even though
black Americans prospered significantly under the presidency of Ronald Reagan, Rev. Jesse "The Gypsy" Jackson continues to spread the mantra of
"Republican bad! Democrat good!""As he left office, a Lou Harris poll found nearly 80 percent of blacks considered his administration oppressive," CNN correspondent Adaora Udoji noted to the Rev. Jesse Jackson Tuesday night.Jackson readily concurred, acknowledging that Reagan's relationship with blacks was "very hostile." In an earlier CNN interview Jackson observed, "Reagan believed in states' rights and Jefferson Davis, I believe in the Union and Abraham Lincoln."
Almost universally, and encouraged by the cheerleaders in the mainstream press, Reagan is excoriated as a pseudo-enemy of blacks and other minorities, when nothing could be further from the truth.
According to statistics gathered from a number of sources, including the 1990 US Census, black unemployment fell faster than white unemployment during the Reagan years.
Los Angeles radio host Larry Elder in a 1999 op-ed for the Ethnic News Watch. "Black teenage unemployment fell faster than did white teenage unemployment. And blacks started businesses at a rate faster than that of whites."In 1981," Elder continued, "the nation's poverty rate stood at 14 percent. It declined to 11.6 percent in 1988, Reagan's last year in office."
According to Census data, the median income of black households was $19,758 in 1990, up 84% from ten years prior. According to the AP, in the same ten year period, the median income of white households only increased 68%.
Other mainstream media sources, including the vaunted New York Times had to admit that poverty had lessened during the Reagan Administration -- which flies directly in the face of Jackson's claims this week.
In addition, high school graduation rates for black students increased, narrowing the education gap with white students.
All of this happened during the Reagan years; years when, according to Jesse Jackson and other professional peddlers of black victimhood (like the NAACP's Julian Bond, for example), black progress was turned back decades.
I talked about Julian Bond's predeliction for shoe leather yesterday. It seems that Jesse Jackson ought to join him in the "idiot statement" department.
Unfortunately, the members of the Soul Patrol, who thrive on keeping black Americans thinking they are victims of society; coupled with the useful idiots in the mainstream American press, won't let truths like this be heard other than by a miniscule number of Americans.
And after all, if CNN says that we've been victimized, then it must be true, right?
Yassuh. Right, boss. Anything you say.
Posted by: mhking at
10:25 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 440 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Why should Reagan get the credit for a Black person starting a business?
Will Clinton get the same credit for the Blacks who started businesses during his terms?
Posted by: DarkStar at June 13, 2004 12:26 PM (cnw1A)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The press has to choke on it's own bile this week
Posted by: mhking at
07:15 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.
Frist: Rename Pentagon, "Ronald Reagan Defense Building"

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) is
planning on introducing legislation shortly that would rename the Pentagon the "Ronald Reagan Defense Building," in memory of the late 40th President.
This is the latest in a batch of measures to honor Reagan.
The Tennessee Republican plans to attach an amendment to the next defense appropriations bill, NBC-TV's Washington affiliate reported Wednesday.
Frist hopes that the ensuing debate would help gauge reaction, both by officials and the public, to the plan.
Reagan is credited with the military's reconstruction and revitalization after being gutted under the Carter Administration.
Posted by: mhking at
04:36 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 107 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Do it!!! Yeah!!
We need some company for Florida's RONALD REAGAN TURNPIKE - a great road to travel. My black ass grins every time I drive past a sign.......okay I get a big grin on my FACE.
Get your minds out the gutter.
Posted by: Beau at June 10, 2004 06:22 AM (GpmN8)
2
I'm not wild on renaming the Pentagon after Ronald Reagan, despite his Cold War accomplishments. Other stuff, but not the Pentagon. That should remain non-partisan.
Posted by: molotov at June 10, 2004 06:27 AM (h3FX8)
3
I'm a democrat and I loathe the United States Military. Pretty much always have in the last (almost) half-century.
I shall decimate it should I ever get power, and quite frankly - based on my actions for decades - don't give a rat's patooti about the Pentagon, a.k.a. military the brain center.
Yet, I should have soooooo much say-so in its naming after a dead president that I hate. Precisely......"DESPITE" my piss poor record that, among other things, endangers the lives of American troops. (Not "MY" word)
Who am I? I'm John Kerry - I voted against every military system designed to save American lives.
Posted by: Beau at June 10, 2004 06:51 AM (GpmN8)
Posted by: La Shawn Barber at June 10, 2004 07:32 AM (Qa+f/)
5
Hmm . . . may I suggest a better choice - George Patton. He was just as well loved as Reagan, and he really did fight in the military as a leader, even though he did step on quite a few people's toes. Let's hold off a bit on proposing sites to be renamed, monetary changes, etc. etc. Let's especially wait to hear Nancy Reagan's wishes on this issues.
Posted by: Lola at June 11, 2004 11:27 AM (V1eTE)
6
I'm as big a Reagan fan as there is, but I don't like this idea.
Posted by: McGehee at June 12, 2004 12:15 PM (BCOpM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 09, 2004
Julian Bond: Reagan years are "a time best forgotten"

NAACP head Julian Bond, who seems to have a habit of shoving his Florsheim's into his mouth, did it again this week, when
talking about the late Ronald Reagan.
"For many Americans, this was a time best forgotten," said Julian Bond, chairman of the NAACP and a longtime civil rights activist. "He was a polarizing figure in black America. He was hostile to the generally accepted remedies for discrimination. His appointments were of people as equally hostile. I can't think of any Reagan policy that African Americans would embrace."
Hmmmm.
Julian, how about programs geared toward small businesses that directly resulted in the largest increase in new black-owned businesses since the Renaissance? How about other tax programs that helped to move more black households into the middle class than anything else before or since?
Should I continue? You seem to like the taste of shoe leather...
Posted by: mhking at
08:34 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 162 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Julian Bond is the ulimate player hater. This may sound harsh, but this kind of thinking won't become laughable to the mass of black folks until old heads like Bond die out.
Posted by: La Shawn Barber at June 09, 2004 09:48 AM (Qa+f/)
2
Harsh? Debatable.
Absolutely True? Only if one refuses to stay in denial, as did Mr. Cosby.
Those old farts are petrified of having to face the truth, that THEY have help destroy the very black communities they claim to want to help.
And just who has the courage to admit 40 years of knowingly deceiving your own people? Not them black folks.
Sad, but true, Lashawn....they do need to pass away, for the most part, 'fore we can progress.
If it's harsh, they made it that way.
Posted by: Beau at June 09, 2004 10:12 AM (GpmN8)
3
The first two comments are completely correct. The problem affects too many older people. They come from a time when left wing propaganda was successful. Many of these old timers, of all races, really believe that socialist theories work. We cannot change them; they are too entrnched to get rid of easily; all we can do is coccoon them in money and fake honours and get them retired.
Posted by: Fred Z at June 10, 2004 04:40 AM (wvFaU)
4
It's a shame. He first came to my attention during the 1968 DNC, when Wisconsin decided to throw another monkey-wrench into the chaos of Chicago, by nominating Bond (IIRC then a Georgia state legislator) for Vice President to spoil what was supposed to be a vote by acclaimation for Hubert Humphrey's chosen candidate, Ed Muskie. He was interviewed on the floor and had the presence of mind and candor to admit that he was not old enough to be VP. He was smooth, handsome, and articulate, and I really thought he was going somewhere--his arc has been singularly disappointing since then. I wonder if 35 years from now we'll feel the same way about Harold Ford. Jr.
Posted by: Pat Curley at June 10, 2004 04:20 PM (XQEqy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Project 21 members remember Ronaldus Maximus

A
new release by Project 21 (of which I'm proudly a member of), highlights comments by several members on the passing of President Ronald Reagan.
Ak'Bar Shabazz (Atlanta, Georgia): "We all mourn the passing of a great leader. As Americans, we bask in the freedoms that Reagan had the clarity of vision to secure. All future presidents will be measured by the great examples that he provided." James Coleman (Los Angeles, California): "I spent my youth as a leftist radical after becoming disillusioned with what I saw as the hesitant policies of the civil rights mainstream. Ronald Reagan convinced me that the conservative movement was my home. As for African-Americans, we can only hope that someday we all recognize the benefits we experienced and continue to experience from the Reagan legacy. Black businesses and businesses owned by women prospered greatly in the 80s. There is a national purpose that was solidified and set the basis for the optimism that sustains our youth and keeps our military vital in such dangerous times. Whether we realize it or not, Ronald Reagan set a philosophical tone that lasts to this day and may indeed sustain us through the hard times ahead."
Donald Scoggins (Springfield, Virginia): "Through his determination and forward thinking, President Reagan paved the way that saw the destruction of communism abroad, as well as here at home. After decades of paralyzing government social programs, Reagan was instrumental in establishing a national climate that allowed for the elimination of welfare as we know it."
Mychal Massie (Zion Hill, Pennsylvania): "Leaders such as the late President Reagan can only be fully appreciated in their passing. While they are admired and referenced in life, it is history that ultimately provides their legacy. I believe that history will reward Ronald Reagan with the honor he justly deserves. He reminded America that ours was a country to be proud of and that our way of life was the envy of the world. And this he did in a way few have before him and none have since him."
I have to echo Mychal Massie's comments.
Reagan will become more appreciated -- especially by many here at home -- now that he is gone, and a more objective eye can be cast on his work.
Reagan was the architect of the fiscal recovery of the 1980s, and helped to fuel the entrepreneurship that fueled the advances of the biotech, internet and real estate sectors that began during the latter years of the Reagan Administration and continued nearly to the end of the century.
Reagan, contrary to the whining that has gone on by pundits far and wide the past few days, was the architect and driving force that caused the fall of the Soviet Union.
And though many on the left get upset by Reagan's cuts of some social programs, the dollars saved from those cuts allowed the nation to recover from a recession that the Carter Administration left the nation in, and restored the adventurous spirit of all Americans.
Civil rights critics, then and now, go out of their way to claim that Reagan set civil rights for blacks back more than fifty years, yet cannot point to any one thing that he did -- outside of eliminating a number of social programs. Reagan put in place programs that allowed and encouraged entrepreneurial growth for all people, black, white and otherwise. Black businesses flourished in this country as a result of this, at an unprecedented rate.
After a decrease in black owned and operated businesses in the 60s and 70s, those businesses -- in all economic sectors -- began to grow at a rate that continues unabated to this day.
Posted by: mhking at
02:49 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 628 words, total size 4 kb.
1
No way man!! It was the American people's fault for the 70s malaise..........not myyyyy ASININE domestic and foreign policies. Nuh-uhhhh!!!
Sincerely,
Jimmy Carter
Punk-Ass Enabling Father of Terrorism
Posted by: Beau at June 09, 2004 03:38 AM (GpmN8)
2
Reagan cut civil rights enforcement. It's that cutting that allowed Black farmers to be denied farmer's benefits that white farmers were getting.
During Reagan's term, the number of EEOC racial complaints, increased.
Let's not forget Reagan's support for Bob Jones Univ.'s attempt to keep their non-profit status even though they discriminated against Blacks. Later, they modified their policy and discriminated against unmarried Blacks. All to stop the "one world" beliefs of "race mixing."
And during Reagan's California term, Reagan supported the idea of racial convenants.
Posted by: DarkStar at June 09, 2004 04:52 PM (cnw1A)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 08, 2004
Stepford Wives ad shows morphed nude Rice

A new
ad for the upcoming remake of
The Stepford Wives, due later this month, goes over the line.
The ad shows National Security Director Condoleezza Rice nude from the waist up, covering her breasts with her arms, and Hillary Clinton as a "Stepford" housewife baking cookies.
The pictures move across the screen very quickly, but they caught the eye of a Kansas City woman, who recorded the spot to make sure of what she was seeing.Becky Reynolds said when she taped and watched the ad again, she "realized it was even worse" than what she'd suspected.
"It's just inappropriate, and it needs to be stopped," Reynolds said.
Reynolds says the less-than-perfect images in the advertisement for the new film will keep her out of the theater. Hillary Clinton and Condoleezza Rice in 'Stepford Wives' ad Pat Gray, who works with Northstar Marketing Group, said the ad shows bad taste toward Rice and Clinton.
The motion picture's production company, Paramount, says they haven't received any complaints...yet.
Posted by: mhking at
12:05 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 179 words, total size 1 kb.
1
This is outrageous! Ummm...er...do you know where I can get more Condi pics?
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at June 08, 2004 02:08 PM (JQjhA)
2
PS-Couldn't find your e-mail link on the page. I just added you to blogroll. Sorry it took so long! I think I was about to before but you made the mu.nu changeover and it messed things up.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at June 08, 2004 02:19 PM (JQjhA)
3
Don't sweat the small ones (pun intended).
Posted by: erp at June 09, 2004 02:34 AM (WddBs)
4
Though the folks who produced this piece of dreck should be checked for active brain waves. I can't help but wonder if it isn't just a case of "tit for tat" in so far as a female icon from both sides of the political spectrum was shown. (and yes the pun was intended *grin*...I couldn't resist)
Posted by: Guy S. at June 09, 2004 08:28 AM (f6cjG)
5
Funny thing is, Hillary did actually make a point of baking cookies in 1992, after she got in trouble for claiming not to be the kind of wife who does that sort of think "like Tammy Wynette standing by my man."
But please -- it's bad enough showing Hillary's face, but
cleavage!? Are they
trying to turn red-blooded American men gay, or what?
Posted by: McGehee at June 12, 2004 12:10 PM (BCOpM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Rock has-been Morrissey: "Bush should have died, not Reagan"

The headline says it all.
The solo artist was on the last leg of his European tour in Dublin, when he announced -- to much cheering and applause -- the death of President Ronald Reagan. Then the singer said something downright offensive (to which he got even bigger cheers and applause from the crowd).
"Bush should have died, not Reagan..."
Maybe he's trying out for the new opening act for the Dixie Chicks.
Then again, there are quite a few moonbats in THIS country with the same view.
Posted by: mhking at
11:41 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 117 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You know you're getting old when you say "Who?" about somebody who's already a has-been.
Posted by: Pat Curley at June 08, 2004 11:54 AM (PJWdB)
2
Don't feel bad -- I'm in that same category...
Posted by: mhking at June 08, 2004 12:06 PM (BW4v8)
3
He shouldn't be surprised if he gets a knock on his front door by Secret Service.
Posted by: Lola at June 09, 2004 05:56 AM (V1eTE)
4
Morrissey is right. What has Bush truly done for anyone? Regan at least was a more humane individual and deserved life, GW Bush has taken away so much from this country and is determined to do the same to the world.
Posted by: Tom at June 11, 2004 03:55 AM (OLrgr)
5
Ex Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulraney at Reagan’s funeral: “In one of his poems, McGee, thinking of his birthplace, wrote poignantly, “Am I remembered in Erin? I charge you speak me true. Has my name a sound, a meaning in the scenes my boyhood knew?” Ronald Reagan will not have to worry about Erin because they remember him well and affectionately there. Indeed they do.”
Not by the local clowns at MorrisseyÂ’s gig in Dublin! And Morrissey has the gall to own a home in LA - wonder if the neighbours will welcome him next time?
Posted by: Dave T at June 11, 2004 01:17 PM (JMdCV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
G8 Summit: Leave it to the moonbat British press to paint Georgia as backward

St. Simons Island, GA is quiet this week; many of the locals having shipped out to parts unknown.
Nearby Sea Island is hosting leaders from across the world as a part of the G8 Summit.
Protesters and much of the press, alike are about 60 miles north of there in Savannah. But many protesters appear to have stayed home, which leaves the press taking pictures of each other.
Well, at least with one exception.
E Jane Dickson of the UK's Independent, apparently with nothing good to say, is having fun inventing negative spin on the gathering and the setting.
...it was announced a year ago that President Bush would be hosting the 2004 G8 Summit on Sea Island (Sea Island as in cotton, as in slaves)......around half the islands' residents have evacuated, scared silly by the double, and largely undifferentiated, threats of international terrorism and violent protest.
He has just heard a rumour that 2,000 body bags have been delivered to the clapboard Chamber of Commerce across the road from the bookstore. This intelligence is passed around like a joint at a fortysomething party, a delicious whiff of recreational danger. Five minutes later, one of the island's fire chiefs drops by, fresh from a briefing. It's not a rumour. The body bags are here, together with a refrigerated lorry to take away the corpses. "I liked it better when it was a rumour," says Larry.
See what I mean?
The entire Independent article reads like that, chock full of quotes and anecdotes, carefully crafted to make Georgia and Georgians look like backwoods hicks.
The article quickly glosses over the fact that St. Simons is a high-end resort community, and that many of the residents are not full-time residents. The article goes out of it's way to suggest that the community is "under siege" by the confab, when, if anything, it's under siege by reporters like Dickson, desperate for some kind of controversy or action to report on. All that's left is to either report on the sea turtles of the coastal beaches, or make stuff up.
Guess which one Dickson chose?
Posted by: mhking at
09:36 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 378 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Just last night the France2 news was complaining that the Georgians were gouging them with fees for renting tables, internet connections & so on (i.e., too smart). Maybe the Independent & France2 should coordinate their views to avoid confusing their sophisticated European viewers.
Posted by: Fausta at June 09, 2004 04:26 AM (WhoVr)
2
TEST OF EMAIL SENT TO THE EDITOR OF THE INDEPENDENT
I was flabbergasted to read the ridiculous article full of totally unsavoury language and downright false statements made by E Jane Dickson in her 'article' "Lockdown on Sea Island". To use such language as 'shit' 'shiny turds' etc shows her lack of courtesy towards her readers. To then slip in ridiculous statements such as 'Sea Island as in cotton, as in slaves),' show she has not bothered actually researching her 'story'. Should I refer to London as 'London as in home of terrorists, as in German child murderers of 1944' and so on? It would be regarded as a lack of manners and very poor reporting.
The majority of homes on Sea Island are like the majority of homes in the Scottish Highlands where I live - empty most of the year and owned by people who live far away. No-one is being forced to leave according to my friend who lives there and indeed she says that apart from the increase in helicopter noise there are few signs of the G8 conference. Obviously there will be hassle but hey we get that weekly in Inverness when the local team are playing!
I presume the E in Jane Dickson name is 'Ernest' as in earnest seeker of truth but too bone idle to actually go and find it and make up stories instead. She would be in good company with Caroline Hawley of the BBC in her hotel in Baghdad who reports so insightfully on incidents that occurred hundreds of miles away...
That's another reader lost.
Posted by: Dave T at June 09, 2004 05:33 AM (IZbKS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Reagan on the $10? (Or the $20?) It could happen...

Democrats in Congress aren't happy with the notion, but Republican Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky is set to introduce a bill which would replace Alexander Hamilton's face with that of President Ronald Reagan on the ten dollar bill.
The decision as to who is on the face of money ultimately resides with the Secretary of the Treasury, but currently, Democrats on the Hill are opposed to the notion of their long-time political nemesis being on the ten-spot.
"Ronald Reagan did many things during his presidency that deserve to be remembered," says Todd Webster, a spokesman for Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle, "and Democrats and Republicans will discuss how best to honor his legacy."
Another proposal would put Reagan's face on half of the dimes minted in the nation from now on; the remaining half would continue to have President Franklin D. Roosevelt's visage.
After this week's ceremonies mourning Reagan's death, leaders of the Ronald Reagan Legacy Project plan to begin lobbying Congress to make the Reagan ten dollar bill a reality.
UPDATE 2P ET: US Rep Dana Rohrbacher is also sponsoring a bill to replace Andrew Jackson's face with Reagan's on the $20. This is a measure that will probably get even wider support, as Jackson is more widely despised than 'co-founding father' Hamilton.
Posted by: mhking at
07:28 AM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 232 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Yep. The 10 is a good idea -- but PLEASE not that photo!!
Posted by: Indigo at June 08, 2004 06:41 AM (shQXa)
2
While the heart may be in the right place, I think everyone should yield respectfully to Nancy Bush in matters like this. She's already expressed her discomfort over the dime idea.
Posted by: Lola at June 08, 2004 08:34 AM (V1eTE)
3
i think without a shadow of a doubt put him on the 20 dollar bill. andrew jackson was the sorry son-of-a-bitch that was in charge of the trail of tears, the removal of the cherokees, choctaws, chickasaws, creeks, and seminoles from their native homes in the southeast to oklahoma, thousands of people dying in that stupid move. reagan may not have been perfect, but he got the berlin wall torn down and led to the demise of communism in russia and eastern europe. who would you rather have as a face on your 20 dollar bill? a genocidal asshole like andrew jackson or someone that saw millions of people liberated from oppressive governments?
Posted by: cherokee at June 09, 2004 05:28 PM (4ZMen)
4
Reagan was a good speaker...as far as memorizing lines go. If only the current president could be half as good at pleasing his handlers. Reagan was a B-movie actor who was lucky that the political climate was in shambles in the 1980s. This is the guy who promised Iran missles if they would wait to release the hostages when he was elected...you may remember the split-screen action of his inauguration and the hostages being set free. Reagan did what he set out to do and that was to make the rich richer and make the deficits larger (trickle-down economics hell). He also took a lot of credit for ending the cold war..which he did do some good..however the war on terror should have started under his administration instead of pulling out us out of Lebanon and not retaliating for the strikes on our marine bases. Iran-Contra was as much grounds for impeachment as was a BJ.
Posted by: Irancontra at June 10, 2004 10:18 AM (brG4j)
5
I love the idea of Reagan on the $10 bill. He was a great man and one of America's best leader!! He is a role model that young Americans should follow!!!! Honor him!!!!
Posted by: Steve Wallace at June 10, 2004 12:55 PM (S2nxn)
6
I don't know a lot about politics, but as a collector of coins and currency I think the concept of somehow implementing Reagan's portrait into our currency is a great Idea. I think the dime idea is good, because we'd have the oppurtunity to use a new coin design honoring the former president, while still maintaining the classic Roosevelt portrait.
But overall I think the paper currency idea is the bravest and most exciting concept.
Posted by: Jacob Goering at June 10, 2004 07:06 PM (0AEEl)
7
Why not create a $5, $10 or $20 dollar gold coin to commemerate President Reagan instead of changing the current currency?
Posted by: Michael Morris at June 11, 2004 03:32 AM (ErOeR)
8
Because Franklin Mint has already done that. Probably at least twice by now.
It's high time to put the man's likeness on coinage people will actually use.
Posted by: McGehee at June 12, 2004 12:06 PM (BCOpM)
9
In response to irancontra's statement; Yea Reagan promised Iram Missles, but they were to be fired AT them if they didn't release the hostages by the time he took office. This is why the hostages were released, and this the flaw in Carter's "soft diplomatic" gestures... you have to stand tough against terrorist.
Posted by: Dennis at October 05, 2004 11:43 AM (KFlLP)
10
In response to irancontra's statement; Yea Reagan promised Iram Missles, but they were to be fired AT them if they didn't release the hostages by the time he took office. This is why the hostages were released, and this the flaw in Carter's "soft diplomatic" gestures... you have to stand tough against terrorists.
Posted by: Dennis at October 05, 2004 11:45 AM (KFlLP)
11
I can't believe that some people want to change the picture on the Ten Dollar Bill. Why would we replace a picture of the man who designed this nation's economy with a picture of the man who has ruined it?
Now, as for the Twenty Dollar Bill, Jackson needs to go, but Reagan was almost as bad as Andrew Jackson was.
Posted by: Michael Kossin at November 11, 2004 02:14 PM (/HwAS)
12
DONT REMOVE OUR FOUNDING FATHERS!!!!!
Posted by: BJ at January 16, 2005 02:51 PM (1EznH)
13
NOOOOOO! Alexander Hamilton was truly a great first secratary of treaury and helped our tiny country get out of a huge debt. He was also a very useful soldier in the american revoultion. Plus it is likely that he wrote 51 essays for the federalist. He helped our nation Oh so much, why remove him from he started?
Posted by: Carla at May 03, 2005 11:51 AM (V35fl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Bubba heartbroken to be left off Reagan funeral speakers' list
From
Drudge:
Controversy develops over Reagan funeral speakers...'President Clinton really held out all hope the funeral would be a nonpartisan event, like Nixon's was,' a top Clinton source said on Tuesday morning. 'He's angry and disappointed neither he nor President Carter have been asked to speak, as of yet'...
The top source says Clinton has been critical that both Bush presidents will address the crowd gathered at National Cathedral.
Former President George H.W. Bush, former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and former Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney will join President Bush in eulogizing Ronald Reagan, Reagan's office announced. Presiding over the service will be former Sen. John Danforth of Missouri, who is an ordained Episcopal priest. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and the Rabbi Harold Kusher will give readings, while Irish tenor Ronan Tynan will sing.
Do you believe the audacity of this man?
What would he do: "I'm sorry Reagan's dead...Oh, by the way, buy my book! It's coming out next week at a bookstore near you!"
Of course, he'd follow it with a Nelson Muntz-like, "HA! Ha!"
Posted by: mhking at
07:17 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 199 words, total size 1 kb.
June 07, 2004
Bush NOT on Illinois election ballot

As of now, the name of
George W. Bush will not be on the November ballot in Illinois.
The reason for this is that Illinois state law requires the names for the November ballot be submitted by the end of August -- a full week and a half ahead of the Republican National Convention, as scheduled this year.
The state legislators have been trying to work on a solution, but Illinois Democrats are doing their level best to forstall any opportunity to alleviate the dilemma.
Barring legislative action, a federal court may have to step in to force election officials in the state of Illinois to place President Bush's name on the November ballot.
Illinois has 21 electoral votes up for grabs this fall; in 2000, Al Gore won Illinois handily, 55% to 42%.
Posted by: mhking at
10:11 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 148 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Figures. I remember this issue being raised months ago... and the dems saying ever-so-graciously that they would NOT to block getting Bush on the ballots. Lying weasels.
Posted by: Deb at June 07, 2004 11:13 AM (f6cjG)
2
It is a pity that no one in the RNC looked at this prior to scheduling the convention. Granted, it is not a big loss. Being on or off the ballot makes little difference in the outcome in Illinois. But it is pretty stinky. I wonder if this might make a difference in other states, if people got riled up about it.
My hunch is that he will be on the IL ballot in the end.
Posted by: King of Fools at June 07, 2004 01:09 PM (ktIW6)
3
This still poses some problems--if Bush does not appear on the ballot he will miss out on something like 2 million votes (what he got in 2000). He could easily lose the popular vote then and win the presidency, which would set the moonbats howling again.
Posted by: Pat Curley at June 08, 2004 01:17 PM (PJWdB)
4
If you are worried about it, just write in his name on the ballot. You can still do that, right?
Veterans against Deserters
Veterans for Kerry
Posted by: Veterans for Kerry at October 14, 2004 06:16 AM (xGZ+b)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Black conservative in Netherlands Parliament challenges Islam head on

Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a Nigerian-born member of Parliament in the Netherlands,
has strong views on Islam, much as many do in this country.
She was raised as a Muslim but has recently become agnostic. She has an incredible command of the Dutch langue and is a sharp debater. She abhors woolly, placating rhetoric, which is so typical of Dutch politics. According to a recent poll she ranks second among the most popular politicians in Holland. And her political star is still rising. Yet her political message stirs a lot of controversy, especially among Muslim radicals.It was the criticism by the late Pim Fortuyn (the Dutch politician who was killed by an animal rights activists) of the impact of Islam on Dutch society which sharpened her awareness of the threat of Muslim radicalism. Fortuyn openly qualified the Islam as a backward religion and Ayaan Hirsi Ali shares this view. When she was still in the socialist party she wanted to put the issue high on the political agenda. But the party did not support her view, because it was afraid that it would play into Fortuyn's hands. Ayaan Hirsi Ali is especially critical of the lack of tolerance for dissenting opinions among Muslims, as well as their oppression of women.
According to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the emotions incited by her statements, especially among radical Muslims, underscores the state of the Islam. (Radical) Muslims are incapable of self-reflection. Consequently, any critical remark is perceived as an offense.
Ali, who would most certainly be considered conservative in this country,
has her share of enemies, thanks to her views.
Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a member of Parliament, recently offered a guy a knife and invited him to stab her when he told her he hoped the "Mojahedin" would kill her due to her sharp and very public criticisms of Islam (he backed down).
She continues to receive death threats from those who oppose her views. More recently,
she's had to resort to bodyguards and other protective measures, especially in light of the assassination of Fortuyn, along with continued overt and subtle threats to her life.
Hirsi Ali — who once wrote Islamic prophet Mohammed was a pervert for taking a 12-year-old girl as one of his wives — has frequently been the target of death threats.The politician wrote in her latest column that she often received death threats by phone and in the mail, but this incident made the biggest impression on her.
Two years ago, she had to hide out in the US for months and these days she is accompanied by bodyguards when in public.
I sometimes wonder about the moonbats here and whether they'd resort to violence to maintain their stranglehold on the minds of black America, if they were ever faced with a substantial challenge to their mentality of collective victimhood.
Posted by: mhking at
06:39 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 489 words, total size 4 kb.
1
I've wondered something of a similar nature... if they'd become violent if there was a mass exodus from the party by people reclaiming their sanity, regardless of color. Not that I think it would actually happen. Too many people are far too complacent to see what is really happening.
I do think we'll see another civil war in this country though. Not sure it will happen in my lifetime, but it sure feels like it's not far off.
Posted by: Deb at June 07, 2004 08:22 AM (f6cjG)
2
I like that "...mohammed was a pervert" bit. How's that for the twist of the aforementioned knife.
Posted by: Glendon at June 07, 2004 03:01 PM (Jdsz4)
3
Has anyone else noticed a trend of black conservative women being
really hot? I mean... just wondering...
Posted by: Beck at June 07, 2004 05:54 PM (fllfQ)
4
She's Somalian. I used to work in a plant in Wisconsin where there were a lot of Somali refugees working. Somalia produes beautiful women.
Posted by: Curt at November 02, 2004 11:17 AM (V2R9/)
5
Hirsi Ali is a Liberal...but people love her because she say's what they with their politically correct mindset can't say. The socialist party PVDA who supports and finances the oppression of women, especially minority women
with children, put her on track. They used Hirsi Ali to go against Pim Fortuyn who was brutally murdered. She labeled him a racist, ect ect. But after his assasination Hirsi Ali with the help of members of the VVD liberals was taken in to help them get the vote. It's been along time coming but the murder of both Pim Fortuyn and Theo van Gogh exposes the extreme leftwing political agenda of the Netherlands that created the breading ground for those Islamo-fascist.
Posted by: Freevoice at December 23, 2004 08:51 AM (p/9rs)
6
Ayaan Hirsi Ali is Somali. Why do you think that all blacks are Nigerians. please give us the right information
Posted by: Mamoud Balde at July 11, 2005 05:39 AM (zn1zt)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Leave it to Allah to come home and offer appropriate humor...
Allah's back!After a hiatus, AllahPundit returns to the fold with....with.....well, you've just gotta see it for yourself....
Posted by: mhking at
06:27 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 40 words, total size 1 kb.
Ted Rall blames 9/11 on Ronald Reagan
When I thought
moonbats like Rall couldn't go any lower, I get a look at his blog entry from yesterday.
How Sad......that Ronald Reagan didn't die in prison, where he belonged for starting an illegal, laughably unjustifiable war against Grenada under false pretenses (the "besieged" medical students later said they were nothing of the sort) and funneling arms to hostages during Iran-Contra.
Oh, and 9/11? That was his. Osama bin Laden and his fellow Afghan "freedom fighters" got their funding, and nasty weapons, from Reagan.
Anyway, I'm sure he's turning crispy brown right about now.
Is there any logical reason at all that any legitimate news agency is even contemplating putting or keeping this man (and I use the term loosely) on their payroll?
Posted by: mhking at
05:32 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 137 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Is there any logical reason at all that any legitimate news agency is even contemplating putting or keeping this man (and I use the term loosely) on their payroll?
Yes, because people still buy their papaers regardless of his presence. Because people still buy the products or services that are listed on the pages he spews his garbage upon. No one is suffering financially because of association with him.
The Free Market often ignores people like him.
Posted by: Marble at June 07, 2004 05:36 AM (VxPRK)
2
He spews the socialist line they love so well in news agencies. He will never hurt for a job.
Posted by: Deb at June 07, 2004 05:47 AM (f6cjG)
3
http://www.historic-battles.com/Articles/soviet_invasion_of_afghanistan.htm
The biggest problem with Rall comments is not that he is being a ass-hole. But the fact that he is wrong. Jimmy Carter actually started CIA funding Afghan freedom fighters.
I too believe Reagan is responsible for our current terrorism problem, but because he pulled out of lebanon just showing the Arab would we were had no staying power.
Bush is much better president than Reagan every was.
Posted by: Scott at June 07, 2004 05:56 AM (jfOL3)
4
Funny. Perhaps Rall should ask the Grenadians how they feel about the invasion (and I concur that the reasons were iffy, but the overall goal of preventing communism's spread in our backyard was not). The country's Thanksgiving is their national holiday honoring the U.S. troops who ousted their Marxist-revolutionary government that sent the country into civil war. Hence, the now democracy annually celebrate the invasion that Rall so derides!
Posted by: molotov at June 07, 2004 05:57 AM (h3FX8)
5
I think Marble's got it right.
Posted by: McGehee at June 07, 2004 06:30 AM (lGoQn)
6
Marble (above) is partially correct. People with messages like Rall's can get and retain positions at newspaper, TV, or online media because people write in about them. The newspapers don't differentiate between good mail and bad mail, the fact that they're getting mail means people are reading them.
The worst thing that can happen is if people ignore them. If people send in angry mail or even cancel their subscriptions the newspapers just promote the writer/cartoonist/wacko as controversial.
Posted by: Keith at June 07, 2004 06:39 AM (DrZwK)
7
Keith, what I meant wasn't that we should ignore him, but that a free market often provides shelter for wastes of oxygen such as Rall.
Canceling your newspaper or refusing to buy Kraft™ Bacon-Ranch dressing because of Rall is too much for most consumers. It is easier for people to ignore scum than it is to take a stand.
I don't get any newspaper that he writes for (at least, I don't think he's carried in the Tampa Tribune) so I can't cancel my subscription. I would have to actually purchase the periodicals that carry his load in order to find out who happened to be advertising on his page and then complain directly to them.
If anyone has that information, I'd be more than happy to write the PR departments of those companies. Heck, maybe that's something
Ted Rall is Full of Crap could help out with.
Posted by: Marble at June 07, 2004 07:31 AM (VxPRK)
8
Marble, I recognize that you weren't suggesting ignoring Rall (heretofore referred to as him, little "h") that was my suggestion. My thought was that all of the people upset at his posts are linking to them and driving his hit level up to unnatural levels and that he would continue to make similar statements as long as it gets him the attention he apparently craves.
On the other hand, insulting him until he goes away is a good plan too.
Posted by: Keith at June 07, 2004 06:38 PM (DrZwK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Jesse Jackson: 'Right Wing Is Not That Popular'
Jesse Jackson spoke at the closing luncheon of the
Take Back America conference in Washington last Friday, and continued his ongoing attack on conservatives.
"The right wing is not that popular. It is sustained by big money. We can have a poor campaign, a rich message, we can outwork [conservatives] because we have a higher sense of purpose, mission and need," Jackson told the crowd.
Jackson also took aim at the press, insisting that they were complicit in the Administration's plans -- ostensibly a bitch-fest due to the fact that he (Jackson) can't get as much television "face time" as he used to.
"One reason why America has been so slow to react [in opposition] to this war is because of misinformation and disinformation. Europeans have reacted with much greater reaction [opposing the war] because they have more options in the media. Our media gets in the bed with the military in wartime," Jackson told a reporter after his speech."The whole media got suckered into the [Bush administration's] disinformation campaign and therefore was disseminating misinformation," Jackson said.
"Their journalism is unabashedly political. The more people who see it for what it is worth, the more they look for a more fair, accurate, balanced reporting. There are facts and there is context and there is truth," Jackson said.
Jackson's speech became -- much as many others' at the confab, a stump speech for John Kerry and a bash-fest on President Bush.
"George Bush campaigned as a compassionate conservative, implying that he was less dismissive of civil rights and labor than [former president Ronald] Reagan was and more open than his father (former president George H. Bush). But [Bush] has been a closed-door conservative," Jackson said."We can do better than George Bush as president," he added to loud applause.
Jackson also addressed some of the liberal activists' disappointment about Sen. John F. Kerry's stance on the Iraq War.
"For us, the issue is not should be we be on Kerry's ticket -- put Kerry on our ticket, we need him as president," he said to applause. A petition circulating among the liberal activists at the event asked for signatures to pressure Kerry to "present a plan to withdraw from Iraq." Kerry, the presumed Democratic presidential nominee, has been accused by some fellow Democrats of straddling the Iraq war issue.
Jackson's visceral hatred is so blatantly obvious in each of his speeches. Jackson attempts to get more face-time to make sure his own agenda stays in front of the American people. But on the whole, many people have seen Jackson for the charlatan that he is and has become.
Posted by: mhking at
02:36 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 436 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Since when do Europeans have more options in the media? USA has conservative, moderate, and liberal media in spades: print, TV, Internet. Europe has the first two in way less abundance, and the last is everywhere. Let's not forget that much of their media is government-owned. What Rev really means is that European media is socialist, which he loves.
Posted by: molotov at June 07, 2004 04:08 AM (h3FX8)
2
Speaking of the weak Euros, boy do we miss that Margaret Thatcher, The Great "Lady Thatcher" and her firm leadership.
A strong conservative and principled woman she is............who, ironically, saved England from economic ruin the same way Ronald Reagan saved us from Jimmy Carter ruin.
What a weak president Carter was, and a weak man he remains.........absolutely worshipped in Europe.
Not to mention, not feared very much by muslim terrorists that wanna kill & maim us, all of whom - along with Jesse Jackson & Osama Bin Laden - will be voting for Mr. Kerry.
Great company.
Posted by: Beau at June 07, 2004 04:49 AM (GpmN8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 06, 2004
Leave it to Danny Glover to piss on the flowers at the funeral home
Danny Glover, still ticked off at conservatives for raining on his personal parade (i.e.,
Aristide's Haitiaan Adventure), has elevated the aforementioned mudslinging into the mainstream.
"We all know Reagan's legacy, from the Iran-Contra affair to the funding of the Nicaraguan military in which over 200,000 people died. The groundwork for the move steadily to the right happened with the Reagan administration. People want to elevate him to some mythic level; they have their own reason for doing that." -- actor Danny Glover, at an anti-war rally in Los Angeles.
This Blog is Full of Crap said it best.
Only a few actors can make the transition from acting to national politics without coming across as a jackass.Reagan. Fred Thompson, and Arnold come to mind.
Danny doesn't. Maybe he's just still pissed over Paul Robeson or something.
Just damn, indeed.
Posted by: mhking at
08:35 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 165 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Bill Cosby was absolutely, 100% correct. We have to stop blaming Whites for the deeply dysfunctional behavior of the Black underclass. We have huge problems facing that part of the Black community - drugs, crime, Black-on-Black violence, the huge numbers of Black men in the criminal justice system, AIDS and "down low" bisexuality, gangs, Black disdain for education as "acting White", fatherless families, rampant teen pregnancy and a 73% illegitimacy rate, lack of respect for the larger society, and a subculture that glorifies "thug life". But the biggest problem is that we still are unwilling to face these problems head-on and at least admit that virtually all of them are self-inflicted. "We" have to fix "us". Thanks, Bill Cosby, and Amen! I appreciate you speaking truth to ignorance. We need to stop blaming Whites for our own self-inflicted problems, we need to get over this "cult of victimhood" mentality (nod to Professor John McWhorter), and we have to admit that the Black underclass bears almost all the responsibility for its current sorry condition. It's just that simple. One final point - I think we should nominate Bill Cosby to be the next president of the NAACP. I'm serious. Cosby just did more to help Black America in one 30 minute speech than Kwesei Mfume has done in the last five years.
Posted by: Jamaal Michaels at June 06, 2004 12:10 PM (oRgtv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
94kb generated in CPU 0.0513, elapsed 0.1443 seconds.
55 queries taking 0.11 seconds, 197 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.